DeVonta Smith Dynasty Fantasy Outlook, NFL Draft Profile & Prop Bets

DeVonta Smith Dynasty Fantasy Outlook, NFL Draft Profile & Prop Bets article feature image
Credit:

Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images. Pictured: DeVonta Smith

DeVonta Smith Draft Profile

Position
WR
School
Alabama
Height
6’1″
Weight
170
40-Yard Dash
N/A
2021 Age
23
Class
SR
Recruit. Stars
3-4
Projected Round
1
NFL Draft Promos: Win $150 if a QB Goes No. 1!

See all the best NFL Draft promos

Bet $20, Win $150 if a QB is taken in R1

100-1 odds on Lawrence to go No. 1, and more!

DeVonta Smith Draft Props

At DraftKings, the over/under for wide receivers selected in Round 1 is 4.5, while it’s 5.5 at Fox Bet.

  • Under 4.5: +140, 41.7% implied odds
  • Over 4.5: -177, 63.9% implied odds
  • Under 5.5: -162, 61.8% implied odds
  • Over 5.5: +120, 45.5% implied odds

While I rely on my own research, I also take a “wisdom of the crowds” approach by surveying an index of mock drafts. I find that these drafts — created by experts with established records of success — collectively give me a good sense of the realistic range of outcomes for what we might see with any given player or pick.

And in these mocks we see the following distributions for wide receivers drafted in Round 1.

  • 3 Wide Receivers: 15%
  • 4 Wide Receivers: 15%
  • 5 Wide Receivers: 50%
  • 6 Wide Receivers: 20%

With these numbers, under 4.5 and over 5.5 lack value, but both over 4.5 and under 5.5 are options.

  • Over 4.5: 63.9% implied odds vs. 70% mock rate
  • Under 5.5: 61.8% implied odds vs. 80% mock rate

If you want to be bold, you can bet both and look to hit the middle with exactly five receivers — but there’s significantly more value on under 5.5 than over 4.5, so I’ll stick with just the one bet on this prop.

In my post-free agency mock draft, I have only four wide receivers going in Round 1. And although I can see how five make it into the top 32, the truest line really is 4.5 with a slight lean to the under.

Smith will go in Round 1, as will Ja’Marr Chase (LSU) and Jaylen Waddle (Alabama), but after them there’s uncertainty. I expect Rashod Bateman (Minnesota) to be the No. 4 receiver, and he’s likely to go in Round 1, but he’s by no means a lock. And Kadarius Toney (Florida) — after entering evaluation season with a great deal of hype — has seen his draft stock cool off recently (per Grinding the Mocks).

By own estimation and by my index of mocks, Toney is a coin flip to go on Day 1.

And as much as I like a few other receivers — Terrace Marshall Jr. (LSU), Rondale Moore (Purdue) and Elijah Moore (Mississippi), for instance — not one of them realistically has better than a 33% chance at the most to be selected before Day 2.

So even if I’m wrong on 4.5 receivers as the true line, that still gives me a lot of leeway before we get to six.

The other props that directly have to do with Smith are less enticing.

In just 10% of the indexed mocks does he go off the board as the No. 1 receiver. I would probably want to see odds of +600 before I started thinking about betting on him, and the best odds I’ve seen are +500 at DraftKings and PointsBet. (Smith is as low as +200 at FanDuel.)

At Fox Bet, there’s also a prop for Smith’s landing spot with these odds for the top teams.

  • Giants: +240, 29.4% implied odds
  • Lions: +275, 26.7% implied odds
  • Eagles: +300, 25% implied odds
  • Dolphins: +333, 23.1% implied odds

Given that just these implied odds already add up to more than 100%, I don’t see any value here. I expect that Smith will be drafted by one of these four teams — as of writing, I have him going No. 7 to the Lions — but predicting his landing spot is just too tough right now with these odds, especially when one considers that his draft stock has dropped precipitously over the past month.

If Smith falls out of the top 10, which is a very real possibility, he could land almost anywhere.

Pick: Under 5.5 wide receivers in Round 1 (-162, up to -500); 1.62 units
Bet Now: Fox Bet


Dynasty Fantasy Analysis

Smith is one of the most polarizing prospects of the 2021 class.

On the one hand, he is awesome at football. This past season, he outright dominated with a nation-best 117 receptions, 1,856 yards and 23 touchdowns in 13 games as a unanimous All-American and the winner of the Heisman Trophy and Biletnikoff Award.

And it’s not as if Smith’s 2020 production came out of nowhere. Despite playing with three first-round receivers in Jerry Jeudy, Henry Ruggs III and Waddle in 2019, Smith was still the top pass catcher for Alabama.

  • DeVonta Smith (13 games): 68-1,256-14 receiving
  • Jerry Jeudy (13 games): 77-1,163-10 receiving
  • Henry Ruggs (12 games): 40-746-7 receiving
  • Jaylen Waddle (13 games): 33-560-6 receiving

For two years, Smith has been the No. 1 receiver in one of college football’s best offenses.

On the other hand, Smith looks entirely unlike any other receiving prospect who has gone on to have NFL success — and not in a good way. It’s not as if he’s a unicorn because he’s so young, big and fast. His uniqueness derives from the fact that he’s old, small and relatively un-athletic.

Devonta Smith

~first WR to win the Heisman in 29 years~
~12 catches, 215 yards, 3 TDs in the 1st half of the National Championship~

Dynasty Twitter: "Old, low BMI, late breakout. He's literally Paul Richardson. Maybe worthy of a late Day 2 pick if he surprises at the Combine."

— Scott Barrett (@ScottBarrettDFB) January 12, 2021

Let’s start with the age concerns.

The issue isn’t just that he’s on the older side, although that’s not great. The bigger issue is his breakout age and year. When a wide receiver breaks out, how old he is and what year he is matters a lot for his NFL projection. All else equal, a player who breaks out as an 18-year-old freshman is much likelier to have NFL success than one who emerges as a 21-year-old junior or senior.

And so it’s problematic for Smith that in 2018 he was the No. 4 wide receiver after Jeudy, Ruggs and Waddle.

  • Jeudy (19-year-old sophomore): 68-1,315-14 receiving
  • Ruggs (19-year-old sophomore): 46-741-11 receiving
  • Waddle (20-year-old freshman): 45-848-7 receiving
  • Smith (20-year-old sophomore): 42-693-6 receiving

Waddle wasn’t on the team in 2017, and No. 1 receiver Calvin Ridley relegated Jeudy, Ruggs and Smith to a forgotten rotational committee as freshmen. But the following year — with Ridley gone to the NFL — Smith had the opportunity to emerge within the offense, and everyone outplayed him even though they were either younger or had fewer years in college.

That’s not good. In fact, that’s bad. That’s a massive crimson-colored flag.

Logan Riely/Getty Images. Pictured: Devonta Smith, Henry Ruggs

And correlated with his older age is his advanced experience. At receiver, the players who enter the league early markedly outperform those who spend four-plus years in college (including redshirt seasons).

Here are the first-round receivers with four-plus years in college to enter the NFL over the past decade.

  • Brandon Aiyuk (2020, 1.25): Promising so far, but let’s wait and see.
  • Corey Davis (2017, 1.05): Are you excited yet?
  • Mike Williams (2017, 1.07): You can stop reading if you want.
  • John Ross (2017, 1.09): Seriously, for the sake of your eyeballs, stop reading.
  • Corey Coleman (2016, 1.15): Are you a masochist?
  • Josh Doctson (2016, 1.22): At this point, you’re just punishing yourself.
  • Kevin White (2015, 1.07): Why? WHY???
  • DeVante Parker (2015, 1.14): It took only five years.
  • Phillip Dorsett (2015, 1.29): Hahahahaha, LOLz.
  • Tavon Austin (2013, 1.08): #JeffFisher, amirite?
  • Justin Blackmon (2012, 1.05): What could have been …
  • Michael Floyd (2012, 1.13): How much longer do I have to go?
  • Kendall Wright (2012, 1.20): How? HOW???
  • A.J. Jenkins (2012, 1.30): My fingers and brain are numb.

This might be the most disgusting list of first-round receivers I have ever typed — and Smith is squarely on this list. That’s another massive flag.

2011-20: Round 1 WRs w/ 4+ years in college …

Brandon Aiyuk
Corey Davis
Mike Williams
John Ross
Corey Coleman
Josh Doctson
Kevin White
DeVante Parker
Phillip Dorsett
Tavon Austin
Justin Blackmon
Michael Floyd
Kendall Wright
A.J. Jenkins

🪦 RIP DeVonta Smith?

— Matthew Freedman (@MattFtheOracle) April 4, 2021

And let’s talk about his size: He’s small, and he’s small in a very particular way. It’s not as if he’s a short-and-small speedster. If he were, that wouldn’t be much of a problem: We’ve seen guys like that have success — Tyreek Hill, T.Y. Hilton, Santonio Holmes, Steve Smith, etc.

The issue with Smith is that he’s a tall-and-lean long strider, and there aren’t many of those guys who have had success. Of course, there aren’t many of those types of guys in general. Perhaps the preeminent “tall drink of water” receiver in the league right now is Robby Anderson, who was 6-foot-3 and 187 pounds at his 2016 pro day.

That Anderson is the guy who comes to mind suggests how rare this kind of receiver is, and that means that we’ve seen very few examples of such a receiver selected early in the draft.

If we stretch the criteria for “tall-and-lean receiver” to include all prospects at least 6 feet and no more than 190 pounds, and then we look at guys selected with top-40 picks since 1990, this is the list we get.

  • Calvin Ridley (2018, 1.26): 6’1″ and 189 pounds
  • Will Fuller (2016, 1.21): 6’0″ and 186 pounds
  • Todd Pinkston (2000, 2.36): 6’2″ and 169 pounds
  • Jerome Pathon (1998, 2.32): 6’0″ and 182 pounds
  • Marvin Harrison (1996, 1.19): 6’0″ and 185 pounds
  • Johnnie Morton (1994, 1.21): 6’0″ and 190 pounds
  • Isaac Bruce (1994, 2.33): 6’0″ and 188 pounds

This list is intriguing, especially since Chad Johnson — 2001, 2.36; 6’1″ and 192 pounds — almost was included, but this cohort collectively highlights the extent to which Smith is unlike other prospects, at least in the modern NFL.

This list is largely made up of guys who played in college in the 1990s. That should be revelatory, because it puts Smith in the proper perspective: He is basically a mid-90s receiver who has been transported to the 2020s.

His build and style of play are straight out of another era. He’s a technician, not a specimen. He’s a route runner, not a sprinter.

ncaa-college football-week 7-betting-picks-predictions-angles-best bets-staff-alabama-crimson tide-georgia-bulldogs-cfp-playoff-sec
Christian Petersen/Getty Images. Pictured: DeVonta Smith (6).

Smith is still significantly smaller than almost all the receivers on this list — and it’s notable that his expected 40 time (4.45-4.55 seconds) is much slower than their assorted times (more on that later) — but this group … it’s actually pretty good.

Harrison and Bruce were Hall-of-Famers. Morton had four 1,000-yard seasons. Pinkston and Pathon weren’t stars, but they were steady — especially as second-rounders. And Ridley and Fuller are two of the most exciting receivers in the NFL today.

If these are Smith’s true predecessors based on build and draft position, his future looks pretty good.

But, remember, all of these guys except for Pinkston are at least 10 pounds heavier than Smith’s current self-reported weight of 170 (he didn’t weigh in at either of the Alabama pro days).

And they are markedly faster.

  • Calvin Ridley: 4.43 seconds
  • Will Fuller: 4.32 seconds
  • Todd Pinkston: 4.45 seconds (unverified)
  • Jerome Pathon: No 40 time, but NFL deep threat
  • Marvin Harrison: 4.38 seconds (unverified)
  • Johnnie Morton: No 40 time, but NFL deep threat
  • Isaac Bruce: 4.53 seconds

Given how much bigger and more athletic Ridley and Fuller are, it’s ultimately wrong to think of them as representative latter-day comps for Smith. The same goes for Anderson, who ran a 4.34-second 40-yard dash in his pre-draft workout. I also don’t think Smith is all that comparable to Pinkston, Pathon, Harrison or Morton.

But Bruce and the aforementioned Johnson (4.57 seconds) warrant more consideration. Both were bigger than Smith, but neither won on the field because of their size. In build, they are more like Smith than other receivers in today’s NFL.

Like Smith, they were unexceptional athletes — or at least they had uninspiring speed. They created separation on the field with their technique, and that’s what Smith does: He already has a full command of the route tree and is probably the best, most nuanced route runner in the class.

That Mac to Devonta connection.@macjones_10 | @DeVontaSmith_6

📺: @AlabamaFTBL Pro Day on @nflnetwork pic.twitter.com/P9euEdRmpR

— NFL (@NFL) March 30, 2021

And Bruce and Johnson also had four-plus years in college, and neither had a Division I breakout until his final season, as both enrolled at smaller colleges (including junior college) before respectively transferring to Memphis and Oregon State.

As weird as this sounds, the prospects to whom Smith is most comparable are two guys who entered the league 20-plus years ago.

And they just happen to be two of the best receivers of their generation.

It seems wrong to compare Smith to two NFL players as heralded as Bruce and Johnson — but maybe it’s not, because we are talking about the first receiver to win the Heisman since 1991.

Regardless of his frame and relative lack of athleticism, Smith is a d–n-good receiver likely to be drafted in the first half of Round 1, and that alone makes him remarkable.

Despite everything negative I’ve written about Smith in this piece, it’s not up for debate that he’s good. The task we have as analysts and decision makers is to contextualize his production and ability so we have a better sense of whether his game will translate to the NFL.

But there’s no doubt that Smith is a great player.

Over the past two decades, only five college receivers (if we include Smith) have had 3,000-plus yards receiving over a two-year span and were then drafted in Rounds 1-2.

  • DeVonta Smith (2019-20, 26 games): 3,112 yards
  • Davante Adams (2012-13, 26 games): 3,031 yards
  • Justin Blackmon (2010-11, 25 games): 3,304 yards
  • Michael Crabtree (2007-08, 26 games): 3,127 yards
  • Rashaun Woods (2002-03, 26 games): 3,062 yards

Woods was a bust, but Blackmon flashed a world of potential before his career was derailed by substance abuse, Crabtree had a solid 10-year stretch in the NFL and Adams is the best receiver in the league.

When combined with his expected draft position, what Smith accomplished in college puts him in an elite cohort of prospects.

And no one should seek to diminish just how strong Smith was in 2020. He dominates the receiver leaderboards in the 2021 Sports Info Solutions Football Rookie Handbook, ranking No. 1 with 2.8 yards per route run, a 36% target share and 9.4 total expected points added per game.

He’s not big or fast, but Smith is complete. He lines up at all the receiver positions — even with Jeudy, Ruggs and Waddle in 2019, Smith most often played as the alpha X receiver — and he produces at all levels of the field.

Last year, he was No. 1 in the nation with 35 receptions and 304 yards on screens, but he was also No. 1 with 15 receptions and 589 yards on targets 20-plus yards downfield (per Pro Football Focus).

He can do it all — and he did it in the SEC against cornerbacks who will start in the NFL.

We can all agree that the SEC, ACC, & Big 10 are the hardest conferences, right?

Players to have a season of 1,200+ rec yards & 15+ TD (since 2005):

– DeVonta Smith
– Ja'Marr Chase
– Amari Cooper
– Justin Jefferson
– DeAndre Hopkins
– Calvin Johnson

End of list.

— Michelle Magdziuk (@BallBlastEm) April 3, 2021

His slight build, average-at-best athleticism, delayed breakout, advanced age and extended time in college are all real issues that ought not to be ignored.

But on the basis of his draft position and elite production over the past two years, Smith looks like a prospect with a rather high ceiling/floor combination. A versatile and productive receiver selected with a premium pick: That sounds like a guy who will have NFL success.

I’m not yet settled on where Smith will rank for me relative to other non-Ja’Marr Chase receivers in this class, but I’m very much not “out” on him. If I get him in rookie drafts, I won’t be disappointed.

NFL Prospect Comp: Isaac Bruce with more draft capital and production but also much less weight


Matthew Freedman is 1,018-828-37 (55.1%) overall betting on the NFL. You can follow him in our free app.

How would you rate this article?