Monday Sharp Report: Angels-Diamondbacks Among 4 Wiseguy Plays
Joe Camporeale-USA TODAY Sports. Pictured: Zack Greinke
Even though it's been a tough first half of the MLB season, the past week was a good one for sharp bettors. Sharp Report plays gained seven units, and inched closer to a positive season total.
Today, sharps have found value on four of the 11 games on the baseball slate, hammering one side and three totals in games starting at 7:05 p.m. 8:10 p.m. 10:07 p.m. and 10:15 p.m. ET.
All data as of 3:15 p.m. ET. For live info, check out our MLB live odds page.
Pittsburgh Pirates (+110) vs. Milwaukee Brewers
7:05 p.m. ET
The Buccos are one of Monday's less popular teams, attracting only 25% of both bets and dollars to this point. Despite that, they've fallen from +125 to +110.
Pittsburgh has triggered four bet signals to Milwaukee's one, including a Pinnacle steam move at +103, indicating that sharps still see plenty of value at the current number.
Tampa Bay Rays-Houston Astros Under 7
8:10 p.m. ET
The Astros enter tonight as winners of their last 11 games, and considering they've averaged 7.4 runs per game over that stretch, it's not hard to understand why 73% of bettors are thinking this game should go over 7 runs.
With 73% of dollars landing on the under, though, sharps clearly have a different opinion.
Arizona Diamondbacks-Los Angeles Angels Under 7.5
10:07 p.m. ET
The public is bit more split on this game, as 52% of bettors have taken the over thus far. Dollar percentages and bet signals, however, have revealed the under as the sharp side.
With three bet signals and 68% of dollars on the under, it's no wonder this total has dropped a full run from its opener.
Miami Marlins-San Francisco Giants Under 7.5
10:15 p.m. ET
Sharpies just can't get enough of these unders today. This one has attracted only 31% of bets, but those have accounted for more than 80% of money wagered on the total.
Additionally, five bet signals have been triggered on the under, all of which have come at the current number.
How would you rate this article?