Catalina Fragoso-USA TODAY Sports. Pictured: Travis Ford
Sick of your typical March Madness bracket? Do you seem to get eliminated on the first weekend every year? There are alternatives out there to your typical bracket that award 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 32 points per round.
Our staff has knocked its heads together to come up with seven frameworks for alternative March Madness pools. Just remember that these can all be tweaked and customized, particularly with the payout structure, to fit your pool participants and interests.
Let’s say you randomly draw teams. The participant with the tournament winner could get 40% of the pot, while the Final Four teams get 15% each. It’s entirely up to you.
You can even mix and match elements from several of these formats. Best of luck!
The Seed Multiplier
This is like picking a typical bracket, but with one major difference — upsets are worth way more.
You multiply the points earned in that round in a normal bracket and multiply it by that team’s seed. So No. 15 Montana knocking off Michigan would get you 15 points since you’d typically earn one point — No. 2 Michigan winning would get you two.
It’s not really a fair scoring system based on the math, and it still makes sense to take higher seeds because of the escalating worth of points in each round. Taking all underdogs in the first round is a good way to lose. But it gives participants incentive to stray from the chalk.
- Pros: It incentives participants to take different teams and stray from favorites.
- Cons: It’s not really a fair scoring system, and it still makes sense to take mostly favorites.
The Lottery Draw
Find an even-ish number of people, pick out of a hat until all the teams are gone. Whoever has the winning team wins the pot.
- Pros: It’s perfect for those not interested in doing research but want to have a rooting interest.
- Cons: You have no control over the teams and only have a rooting interest on a handful of games.
Like a fantasy football league, you draft teams in snake format (so with eight teams, the No. 1 pick will have the No. 16 and 17 picks, too).
- Pros: Every participant gets some top seeds, some realistic mid-majors and some longshots. It’s a good mix.
- Cons: You’ll only have rooting interest in a handful of games.
Also known as a Calcutta Pool. There are so, so many different ways to do this, and they’re all pretty fun.
You host an auction with anywhere from 4-16 people. You bid on teams, and when those teams win games, you collect a portion of the pot. Each team can have a fixed budget or unlimited. If someone wants to spend $100 on Duke while Auburn goes for $15, so be it. Typically, the first-round games are worth about 1% of the pot, escalating from there.
- Pros: Auctions, in any fantasy and pool format, are incredibly fun. You have access to every team, there’s incentive to be contrarian, it requires a tremendous amount of thought (in a good way) and the stakes can get really high if there’s no cap.
- Cons: Auctions are best done in person, and if you can’t get a big enough crew together, it won’t work. They also turn into logistical debacles and can take forever once you’re through a few rounds of drinks.
There are a million ways to do this one, too, which is part of why it’s so fun.
But here’s an example: Each participant picks one team per day of the tournament to win straight-up, and once you use a team, you can’t use it again. If your team loses, you’re eliminated. Last person standing wins.
Another fun format from our resident pool expert Stuckey — you pick four games against the spread on Thursday and must go 3-1 ATS to advance. Then you have to go 2-1 on Friday, and win one game ATS each day for the rest of the tournament.
- Pros: There are many different ways to approach a pool like this, and the stakes get high as the tournament goes on.
- Cons: Requires consistent attention and monitoring throughout the tournament, and participants can be eliminated faster than in a traditional bracket — literally after the first game.
The 10-Man Roster
A mini fantasy league taking only points into account. Hold a snake draft where each participant drafts 10 players, trying to balance who will score when they play but also which teams will go far and have more chances to score.
The fourth scoring option on the national championship winner will outperform the leading scorer on a team that gets knocked out the first weekend.
- Pros: Rooting for both teams to advance and players on those teams to succeed adds an additional layer of rooting interest.
- Cons: Requires additional research beyond the teams, and you could be eliminated early.
This type of pool is almost entirely betting focused, and takes a lot of management and active participation.
Participants start with, say, $100 dollars, and need to wager on games throughout the tournament and try to build the biggest bankroll possible by using that fake $100 to bet on games. You can bet all $100 on one game from the start, or $5 on 20 games. It’s so open-ended.
- Pros: Building a bankroll over the tournament is challenging, fun, and there are so many different ways to approach it.
- Cons: It’s hard to manage, and it takes active participants who are consistently monitoring their bankrolls and what they want to bet.