HomeRight ArrowPolitics

GOP’s Spending on South Carolina Senate Race Reveals Concerns in Graham vs. Andrews Midterms

GOP’s Spending on South Carolina Senate Race Reveals Concerns in Graham vs. Andrews Midterms article feature image
2 min read
Credit:

USA TODAY Network via Reuters Connect. Pictured: Darline Graham.

Republicans just committed $5 million to defend a Senate seat they were supposed to win without much of a fight. That single number, confirmed Tuesday by AP, says more about where the 2026 midterms stand than almost any poll released so far this cycle. Before getting into why South Carolina's Senate race between Sen. Darline Graham and Dr. Annie Andrews suddenly looks worth watching, check out this week's Polymarket promo code, read our Polymarket review for a full breakdown of the platform, and download the Action Network app for more picks and analysis.

If you want more Action Network content, be sure to add us as a preferred source on Google.

South Carolina Senate Race on Polymarket

Prediction markets let traders buy and sell contracts tied to how a real-world event will turn out, elections included. A contract's price reflects what the crowd collectively expects to happen, and it shifts as new information comes in; money changes hands with every move, which tends to make these markets react faster than traditional polling.

A Seat Republicans Didn't Expect to Defend?

South Carolina hasn't elected a Democrat to the Senate since Fritz Hollings left office 2 decades ago, and Donald Trump carried the state by 18 points in 2024. On paper, this looked like one of the safest holds on the Republican map this cycle. Instead, the Senate Leadership Fund, the main outside group aligned with Majority Leader John Thune, is now pouring money into a race most strategists expected to stay off the national radar entirely.

The spending follows a late-September Trafalgar Group poll that put Graham ahead of Andrews, a pediatrician, by just a single point; inside the poll's own margin of error. Jaime Harrison, the former Democratic National Committee chairman who challenged Lindsey Graham in 2020, has described this cycle's matchup as one of the more unusual races he's watched develop. South Carolina Republican strategist Chip Felkel was more cautious, calling a Democratic win here "such an uphill battle."

Graham's own campaign appears to share some of that unease. In a recent fundraising appeal, she warned supporters that her message isn't reaching enough voters and that her team needs more airtime before Election Day arrives.

Why This Market Is Worth Trading This Week

  • Senate Leadership Fund just confirmed a $5 million push for a seat Republicans weren't expecting to defend.
  • The most recent independent poll has Graham up by just one point.
  • Polymarket's contract still prices Graham as the clear favorite, well ahead of where that poll suggests the race actually sits.

That gap between the polling and the contract price is exactly the kind of setup worth paying attention to. If the ad spending fails to settle Graham's numbers, or Andrews keeps closing ground in fundraising and name recognition, there's real room for this contract to move before November 3.

If South Carolina's deep red lean reasserts itself once ads start airing statewide, the current price could just as easily hold or extend further in Graham's favor. This isn't the first Senate race this cycle where market pricing and local reporting have told two different stories… but it might be the one with the widest gap between the two right now.

With roughly $660,000 already traded on this single market, South Carolina isn't the afterthought it looked like a few months ago, and the next few weeks of spending and polling should start showing up in the price one way or another.

Author Profile
About the Author
Pablo Planovsky • Verified Action Expert

This site contains commercial content. We may be compensated for the links provided on this page. The content on this page is for informational purposes only. Action Network makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information given or the outcome of any game or event.