Tyler Jacobsma is the founder of Flowframe.xyz, which provides in-depth content and tools for prediction market traders.
Every week, we'll look at two Polymarket markets and check where the top-30 most profitable traders are positioned. Not every top trader plays every market, but when they do, and when they land on the same side, we pay attention.
Past P&L doesn't guarantee future accuracy. But it's worth keeping an eye on.
View the full Smart Money tool and all top trader positions at flowframe.xyz/smart-money.
US × Iran Permanent Peace Deal by April 30?
Current price: 38% YES
Top 30 positioning: 3 in this market. All 3 on YES. Zero on NO.
Combined position size: $27K
Who's Betting What
Three of the top 30 are positioned here. Biggest: $23K at 32% entry (+15%). Another $2K at 26% entry (+44%). A third at $3K, 34% entry.
The market is at 38%, and this positioning implies that fair value is closer to 56%.
What It Might Signal
April 30 is a hard deadline. YES requires a signed deal in days, not months. At 38% YES, a contract pays roughly 2.6x if it resolves. The market says it’s still unlikely, but the sharps are betting the odds of a deal are higher than the current pricing.
These are still speculative trades, but when three top-30 traders line up on the same side of a 38% contract, it's worth noting.
The bet seems to be: both sides need this war to end, Pakistan has enough leverage to bridge the gap, and a deal gets forced through before the April 21 ceasefire expires.
The Context
Islamabad talks collapsed last weekend, and JD Vance walked out after the US's "best, final offer." However, Pakistani Field Marshal Asim Munir flew to Tehran on Wednesday with a new message, and White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Wednesday: "We feel good about the prospects of a deal." Al Jazeera reports Pakistani officials expect a "major breakthrough" on the nuclear front.
Working against YES: Trump imposed a Navy blockade after talks failed. Iran called it a ceasefire violation.
What to watch
If a second round of Islamabad talks happens April 19-20 and produces any joint statement before April 21, this rockets. If the ceasefire expires without a deal, NO becomes the main narrative fast.
Use Polymarket invite code Action to get early access and bypass 1 million+ people on the waitlist. Our Polymarket invite code also unlocks a trading bonus: Deposit $20, Get $20 Bonus!
Iran Agrees To End Uranium Enrichment by April 30?
Current price: 35% YES
Top 30 positioning: 3 in this market. All 3 on YES. Zero on NO.
Combined position size: $11K
Who's Betting What
Same story, different market. Three of the top 30, all on YES. Biggest: $8K at 30% entry (+18%). Another at 13% entry (+160%). A third entered at 10% with $150 (+250%).
The entry prices tell you something. Some of the money was bet on Iran giving up enrichment back when the market thought that was nearly impossible.
With the market at 35%, this positioning implies fair value is at around 52%.
What It Might Signal
This is the harder bet than the peace deal market. Ending enrichment is the one concession Iran has called non-negotiable. It’s a matter of sovereignty. At 35% YES, a contract pays about 2.9x if it resolves.
The top traders positioning here aren't just betting on a deal, they're betting the deal includes Iran backing down on the exact thing they said they'd never back down on, and will get paid out ~3x if they are right.
The Context
Islamabad talks collapsed precisely on this question. The US proposed a 20-year moratorium. Iran countered with a 5-year pause, but the US rejected that.
But a compromise might be emerging. Netanyahu confirmed that the US and Israel both want the enriched uranium out of Iran entirely. Russia has offered to take the stockpile. Options reportedly include shipping it to a third country or down-blending it to 3%, which is reactor-grade, not weapons-grade.
"Agrees to end" is doing a lot of work in this question. A 20-year moratorium counts, but a 5-year pause probably doesn't.
What To Watch
Language matters more than the fact of a deal. Watch for "moratorium" vs. "suspension" in any joint statement. If Russia announces it's taking the 440 kilograms, this contract is effectively resolved YES regardless of the specific enrichment language.
The Wrap
Two markets, one unanimous call. Every top-30 trader who's taken a position on either market is on YES. Some of them got in when these outcomes were priced in the teens.
The pattern across both suggests these traders are reading them as one bet: a deal happens, and that deal includes backing down on enrichment.
They could be wrong, or they could be planning to take profit soon. Islamabad talks just collapsing is not a good sign, but the traders with the best track records on the platform haven't moved, yet.
See all top trader positions across every Polymarket contract at flowframe.xyz/smart-money.
