NFL Week 2 Predictions: 7 Data-Driven Bets for Sunday, Including Player Props, Anytime Touchdowns, More

NFL Week 2 Predictions: 7 Data-Driven Bets for Sunday, Including Player Props, Anytime Touchdowns, More article feature image
Credit:

Photo by Rob Carr/Getty Images. Pictured: Terry McLaurin.


For the latest NFL odds, click here.


The must-have app for bettors

The best betting scoreboard

Free picks from proven pros

Live win probabilities for your bets

NFL Odds & Picks

Click on a pick to skip ahead
Either Team To Score 3 Unanswered Times
1 p.m. ET
Christian McCaffrey Rushing Yards
1 p.m. ET
Commanders WRs ATD Bets
1 p.m. ET
Team That Scores First Loses
1 p.m. ET
T.J. Hockenson Receiving Yards
1 p.m. ET
NE-PIT 1H Under 20.5
1 p.m. ET
Daniel Carlson Kicking Points
4:25 p.m. ET

Pick
Either Team To Score 3 Unanswered Times — No (+175)
Best Book
Time
1 p.m. ET

Billy Ward: This one is a pure math play. Based on the five years of data I collected on the subject, games with spreads of two or less have either team score three unanswered times only 56% of the time.

This prop correlates heavily with the spread, with various sportsbooks missing that fact in their pricing. BetMGM is offering +175 on “No,” when the fair value should be roughly +130.

LionsCommanders has a similar spread and thus the same approximate 8% edge this weekend (if you can find "No" at +175). I prefer GiantsPanthers for this bet thanks to the lower total. While this prop doesn’t correlate as heavily with the total, lower total games do favor the “No” side slightly.

This bet can be found in the “scoring props” tab on BetMGM.


» Return to the table of contents «


Pick
Christian McCaffrey Under 65.5 Rushing Yards (-113)
Best Book
Time
1 p.m. ET

Sean Koerner: The Panthers threw on early downs at a league-high rate in Week 1. I expect that trend to continue against the Giants' pass-funnel defense.

It’ll be tough for McCaffrey to find room to run behind his offensive line, especially against a Giants defensive front that limited Derrick Henry to 82 yards on 21 carries last week.

I expect the Panthers to produce dump-off passes to McCaffrey that will essentially be an extension of their rushing attack.

I’m projecting CMC’s median closer to 59.5 yards.


» Return to the table of contents «


Pick
Commanders WRs ATD Bets
Best Book
Time
1 p.m. ET

Nick Giffen: There’s a bit of a market overreaction to the Lions giving up four rushing touchdowns in Week 1, creating value on the Commanders’ receiving corps.

Last year, the Lions gave up the 12th most touchdowns to the WR position; A.J. Brown just torched them for 155 receiving yards, but he couldn’t find the end zone.

There are reasons to like the top-three Commanders WRs, and our projections show value on each of their anytime TD props.

Here are their anytime TD value bets, with our projection’s fair odds for each in parenthesis.

Instead of trying to shoot fish in a barrel and pick which one will hit, it’s possible to size your units so that you make a small profit if just one hits. And should two or more hit, you’re quite happy!


» Return to the table of contents «


Pick
Team That Scores First Loses (+140)
Best Book
Time
1 p.m. ET

Billy Ward: Speaking of Commanders-Lions, there’s another math/trends-based bet that I like. The edge is a bit smaller in this one, but the fair price on this bet in games with a spread of three or less should be about +133.

With BetMGM leaving +140 on the board, there’s a slight edge based on that. Additionally, the higher the total, the more likely the team to score first is to lose, making this the better option than Giants-Panthers for this prop.


» Return to the table of contents «


Pick
T.J. Hockenson Under 44.5 Receiving Yards (-115)
Best Book
Time
1 p.m. ET

Sean Koerner: Hockenson has elite underlying usage, but he may need five-plus receptions to clear this number given his 6.0 aDOT.

D'Andre Swift only saw three targets last week, which will only go up (and likely at Hockenson’s expense). Amon-Ra St. Brown and D.J. Chark will continue to command targets as well.

The Lions also had the second-highest rush rate on early downs (in a neutral game script).

I project this number closer to 39.5.


» Return to the table of contents «


Pick
1H Under 20.5 (-105)
Best Book
Time
1 p.m. ET

Billy Ward: We went to this well last week with the Steelers, with the bet ending as either a push or half-point loss depending on the sportsbook. The offenses held up their end of the bargain, but a Steelers pick-six ended up costing us. As mentioned then, Pittsburgh played nearly five seconds faster in the second half of games than the first in 2021.

That trend continued into 2022, with Pittsburgh ranking 26th in first-half pace but first in second-half pace last week. That’s despite holding a 17-6 halftime lead against the Bengals. The Patriots also play faster in the second half than the first, both last season and in Week 1 of 2022.

Assuming the 40.4 pregame total is roughly efficient, that points toward the under in the first half. There’s even more reason to like it this week, with key offensive players Najee Harris and Mac Jones both banged up.


» Return to the table of contents «


Pick
Daniel Carlson Over 6.5 Kicking Points (-135)
Best Book
Time
4:25 p.m. ET

Nick Giffen: The Raiders have an even higher implied team total this week than the Rams, ranking second in the league at 28.5.

Last week, even on one leg for part of the game, Harrison Butker dropped seven points against the Cardinals. Kansas City racked up 488 yards of offense in that blowout win.

This week, I’m projecting the Raiders for more than two field-goal attempts and three extra-point attempts.

My model has this going over 6.5 at 63.6% of the time with a fair value of -175.

The best odds for Carlson are at bet365 (-135) and DraftKings (-140). I’d bet Carlson to go over his total up to -150.


» Return to the table of contents «


How would you rate this article?

This site contains commercial content. We may be compensated for the links provided on this page. The content on this page is for informational purposes only. Action Network makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information given or the outcome of any game or event.