Download the App Image

US Open Round of 16 Predictions, Previews: Betting Breakdown For Sunday Slate

US Open Round of 16 Predictions, Previews: Betting Breakdown For Sunday Slate article feature image
Credit:

Elsa/Getty. Pictured: Court 4 of the US Open.

Looking for Monday’s best bets? Click here!

The round of 16 action rolls on at the US Open with some Sunday action, and there are a whole host of matches set to be played in both the men’s and women’s draws.

While our experts are seeing less value in this group of matches than Saturday’s, that doesn’t mean we’re without quality wagers.

Read on to see where our analysts are putting their bets in on Sunday.

Matches are listed in chronological order. Match times are subject to change and many will be played after the projected start time. Read here for advice on watching the US Open.

Matteo Berrettini vs. Alejandro Davidovich Fokina

11 a.m. ET

Big-hitting Matteo Berrettini takes on the crafty Alejandro Davidovich Fokina to kick off the day.

Luke Holmberg discusses why you should be getting behind the underdog.

Coco Gauff vs. Shuai Zhang

2 p.m. ET

Will young American Coco Gauff get past a tough oppponent in Shuai Zhang with ease? David Gertler doesn’t think so.

Read on for his match preview in a battle of stylistic intrigue.

Pablo Carreno Busta vs. Karen Khachanov

2:15 p.m. ET

Pablo Carreno Busta has pulled off some ridiculous tennis in recent weeks, and he now goes up against Karen Khachanov.

Will the Russian be able to test the Spaniard? Read on to find out what Holmberg thinks.

Liudmilla Samsonova vs. Ajla Tomljanovic

4:15 p.m. ET

Beating Serena Williams in her US Open finale was a landmark moment in Ajla Tomljanovic’s career, but will she be able to back it up against an in-form player?

Gertler explores the fascinating match.

Daniil Medvedev vs. Nick Kyrgios

7 p.m. ET

The pinnacle of the day comes in primetime, as world No. 1 Daniil Medvedev takes on the always-entertaining Nick Kyrgios.

Kenny Ducey checks in to give you his best bet.

How would you rate this article?