Check out my UFC 328 predictions for every fight on tonight's pay-per-view at Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey.
Below, I look at the latest UFC 328 odds and break down and predict each bout on today's PPV fight card with updated odds. You can also find my prop and finish projections for each fight.
Let's break it down.
UFC 328 Predictions
After examining all betting options, a typical UFC card can offer substantial actionable value, and after looking at the UFC 328 odds, today's event is no exception.
So, in addition to moneylines and over/unders, I'll break down how I plan to bet on all the fights based on the latest UFC 328 odds, including exact winning methods, winning round props, and whether the match will go to a decision or finish inside the distance.
UFC 328 odds are as of Saturday morning and via DraftKings. Bet on UFC 328 with our DraftKings promo code.
UFC 328 Moneyline Projections
Odds as of Saturday and via DraftKings.
UFC 328 Prop Projections
In addition to creating a crowdsourced projection for moneyline plays, I also collect data on each fighter's likelihood of winning by Decision, knockout, or submission, enabling us to determine fair odds for each fight to go the distance and for each fighter to win inside the distance.
| Picks |
|---|
| Clayton Carpenter vs. Jose Ochoa |
| Baisangur Susurakev vs. Djorden Santos |
| Pat Sabatini vs. William Gomis |
| Roman Kopylov vs. Marco Tulio Silva |
| Jim Miller vs. Jared Gordon |
| Grant Dawson vs. Mateusz Rebecki |
| Joel Alvarez vs. Yaroslav Amosov |
| Ateba Gautier vs. Ozzy Diaz |
| King Green vs. Jeremy Stephens |
| Sean Brady vs. Joaquin Buckley |
| Alexander Volkov vs. Waldo Cortes-Acosta |
| Joshua Van vs. Tatsuro Taira |
| Khamzat Chimaev vs. Sean Strickland |
Fight times are approximate and subject to change. All times ET.
Clayton Carpenter vs. Jose Ochoa
| Flyweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Carpenter | +142 |
| Ochoa | -170 |
| Over/Under 2.5 Rounds | -195/+150 |
Projection: Ochoa (66.5%)
There are a plethora of striker vs. grappler matchups on this card, including the opener between American Clayton Carpenter and Brazilian-trained Peruvian Jose Ochoa.
Carpenter earned a contract with a decision over Edgar Chairez on Contender Series in 2022 and finished each of his first two opponents with rear-naked chokes, but has struggled against fellow grapplers in recent matchups (a decision loss to Tagir Ulanbekov and a submission loss to Jafel Filho). Ochoa has a close loss to Lone'er Kavanagh and a finish over Cody Durden, but he was outgrappled by Asu Almabayev (landed 7 takedowns, 9:26 control time) in his last fight.
Carpenter is a relatively proactive wrestler (3.7 attempts per five minutes at distance). Still, I view him as a lesser grappler (49% control rate) and athlete than a fighter like Almabayev, for instance, and with Ochoa training at the same gym as Charles Oliveira, Daniel Willycat Santos, Marco Tulio, and other UFC talent, we know that Ochoa (59%) and other fighters in that gym don't have the best takedown defense, but they all have the skillset to scramble back to their feet.
Ochoa has a clear striking edge (+0.9 to +0.5 differential per minute at distance with more power), which has added value in a southpaw vs. orthodox matchup.
I projected Ochoa's moneyline near -200, and I would bet him to around -185 prefight.
You can also monitor how he responds to the grappling exchanges in the first round, and potentially add a live bet too. I'd expect Carpenter to land an early takedown or two. Still, if Ochoa can scramble back up with confidence, or if he loses a close round while getting outwrestled early but has more success near the end, I would consider taking or adding to a position on his moneyline.
Bets
- Jose Ochoa (-170, 0.25u), DraftKings; bet to -185
- Jose Ochoa Live after Round 1
Baisangur Susurkaev vs. Djorden Santos
| Middleweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Susurkaev | -700 |
| Santos | +500 |
| Over/Under 1.5 Rounds | -175/+135 |
Projection: Susurkaev (84.9%)
I don't project an actionable edge on the bout between Khamzat Chimaev's teammate, Baisangur Susurkaev, and American Top Team-trained Brazilian Djorden Santos, on the moneyline, the total, or in any winning method markets.
Susurkaev is the bigger man (2" taller, 4" reach advantage), but I haven't been overly impressed with his athleticism or power/explosiveness. He's technical and well-rounded, and can seemingly maintain a pace for 15 minutes, but I'm uncertain that his physicality will translate as he ascends the middleweight rankings.
I think Djorden Santos can be competitive in this fight. Still, I don't think he'll be able to cage-push long enough to negate Susurkaev's far more efficient striking style (combined 112% vs. 92% significant striking accuracy and defense).
Ultimately, I expect Susurkaev to pull away – if not find another late finish, and we'll hope that builds more fade equity for a better spot down the line.
Bets
Pat Sabatini vs. William Gomis
| Featherweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Sabatini | -205 |
| Gomi | +170 |
| Over/Under 2.5 Rounds | -166/+130 |
Projection: Sabatini (71.3%)
Pat Sabatini is an elite grappler who has shown a suspect chin when hit cleanly, which has suppressed the moneyline price in his subsequent fights. The 35-year-old American has an elite combination of wrestling (averages 14.8 takedown attempts per five minutes at distance) and jiu-jitsu (88% control rate); both of his losses came when he tried to engage in striking exchanges rather than wrestle.
William Gomis is a fleet-footed Sanda fighter with a size advantage (4" taller, 3" reach) and a technical striking edge (+1.1 to -0.7 differential per minute at distance). Still, he doesn't carry significant power in his hands (his lone UFC knockout came via a body kick), and Gomis often fails to separate from his opponents on the scorecards (five career split or majority decisions).
Every opponent has taken down Gomis, but one that he has faced in the UFC (denied 21 of 29 attempts, 72%), and Sabatini is the best wrestler and grappler he has faced to date. Gomis also tends to leave his neck exposed in scrambles, and Sabatini will capitalize on those mistakes.
I'd expect Sabatini to land a takedown fairly quickly and either maintain top position or advance to lock in a body triangle. From there, Gomis will have to avoid getting submitted, try to scramble up, or wait out the clock and look to avoid getting taken down in subsequent rounds.
Sabatini should be able to dictate where this fight takes place, and so long as he doesn't stand in front of his opponent and try to exchange with a superior striker – as he did in losses to both Diego Lopez and Damon Jackson – I'd expect him to extend his winning streak to four.
I projected Pat Sabatini as a near-250 favorite and would bet his moneyline up to -230.
Bets
- Pat Sabatini (-165, 0.5u), DraftKings; bet to -230
Roman Kopylov vs. Marco Tulio Silva
| Middleweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Kopylov | +154 |
| Silva | -185 |
| Over/Under 2.5 Rounds | +105/-135 |
Projection: Tulio (54.7%)
For additional information on Saturday's middleweight prelim, check out the full fight preview from my colleague, Billy Ward.
Marco Tulio is the better athlete, while Roman Kopylov is the more technical fighter in this potentially thrilling middleweight matchup between a pair of voluminous strikers.
If Tulio doesn't grapple, I'd expect this to play out closer to a 50-50 striking match, where Tulio lands the bigger punches. Still, Kopylov potentially outworks him, particularly in the second and third rounds. I don't trust either man's gas tank, but technique beats athleticism and explosiveness when two strikers tire.
I projected Kopylov around +120 in this fight, and would play his moneyline down to +135. While Kopylov slows down, he has never been knocked out, and the market may be overweighting Tulio's UFC volume in a small sample while underweighting his current durability concerns, six months removed from a bad knockout loss.
And given that recent knockout loss, you might see a more cautious Tulio here early, too.
In addition to Kopylov's moneyline, I also show an edge on the fight to go to decision (projected +100, listed +130). You can also play the Over 2.5 Rounds (+108) or the Fight to Start Round 3 (-125).
Bets
- Roman Kopylov (+160, 0.25u), ScoreBet, bet to +135
- Fight Starts Round 3 (-125, 0.25u), DraftKings; bet to -150
Jim Miller vs. Jared Gordon
| Lightweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Miller | +220 |
| Gordon | -270 |
| Over/Under 2.5 Rounds | -200/+154 |
Projection: Gordon (72.9%)
Northern New Jersey native Jim Miller will extend his record for most UFC fights with his 46th walk to the octagon on Saturday, in a matchup against New York's Jared Gordon.
Gordon (9-7 UFC record) is both the younger man and the more efficient striker (+1.2 to -1.0 differential per minute at distance), but the soon-to-be 43-year-old Miller can still crack, and is arguably the more durable fighter.
Either man can land a finishing blow on the feet against an opponent well above the median age bracket for the division, and both are deadly submission grapplers who can lock up a club and sub after hurting their opponent.
Most importantly, Gordon is both five years younger and the better control grappler across all datapoints (74% to 44% control rate; averages 3.4 to 2.1 takedown attempts per five minutes at distance; 33% vs. 45% accuracy; 60% to 49% takedown defense); so long as he avoids getting clipped or sucked into a guillotine by Miller, I'd expect him to take over the fight against a wilting, older opponent.
I don't project an edge on either side of the moneyline, but I do like this fight to finish more frequently than the odds suggest; I set the finish chances around 47.5% (projected +110) compared to a three-round divisional average of 52.2% (-109 implied), and listed odds of +130 (43.5% implied).
I also show the correlated value either on Gordon by KO/TKO (projected +310, listed +400) or on Miller by submission (projected +960, listed +110). I would consider playing either of those individually, or combining those angles into a double chance prop (projected +195, listed +215 at DraftKings).
The simplest approach is to bet the ends inside the distance prop. And you can target Gordon live against his 43-year-old opponent, after Round 1.
Bets
- Fight Ends Inside the Distance (+130, 0.35u), FanDuel; bet to +120
- Jared Gordon Live after Round 1
Grant Dawson is a similar fighter to Pat Sabatini, both physically and stylistically: both are proactive grapplers (12.2 takedown attempts per five minutes, 91% control rate, and 73% of fight time on the ground for Dawson) who excel with both their wrestling and jiu-jitsu, but both seem awkward and chinny when forced to strike (I could say the same for Sean Brady, also on this card). Still, while Sabatini has a grappleable opponent, Mateusz Rebecki is a compact and competent defensive grappler who pressures opponents and carries significant power on the feet; he may only need one clean exchange to finish the fight.
Dawson was knocked out on the first exchange by King (then Bobby) Green in March 2024, and he was finished by Manuel Torres in his last fight after both of his takedowns were stuffed. Dawson's striking (and chin) are clear liabilities when his wrestling isn't working.
Dawson's path is to chain-wrestle from the outset, get on top, or secure a back take and body triangle, then either consolidate position or hunt for a submission. Rebecki's path is to stuff one or two early entries, force Dawson to commit on shots, and counter as he resets. Rebecki has fight-ending power if his striking lands clean, and Dawson's recoverability has been compromised by his recent knockout losses.
I do show a small edge on the underdog (projected +122, listed +140), and I would play him small to +120, but I also show an edge on this binary fight to end inside the distance (projected -125, listed 104), and I would place both wagers. Rebecki – who has earned a Fight of the Night bonus in each of his past three appearances- keeps a pace that should generally force finishes.
Bets
- Mateusz Rebecki (+140, 0.25u), Caesars; bet to +120
- Fight Ends Inside the Distance (-104, 0.35u), FanDuel; bet to -120
Joel Alvarez vs. Yaroslav Amosov
| Welterweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Alvarez | +160 |
| Amosov | -192 |
| Over/Under 1.5 Rounds | -215/+165 |
Projection: Amosov (59.6%)
Saturday's welterweight prelim between former Bellator champion Yaroslav Amosov and rising contender Joel Alvarez is my favorite fight on the card.
Alvarez, a former lightweight, remains massive for the 170-pound division (3" taller, 2" reach advantage), and I'd expect him to continue to improve as he fills out physically in his new weight class.
I view him as the more dangerous striker in this matchup, but he's likely to accept the bottom position and hunt for submissions from there against Amosov, who is the better wrestler.
Alvarez has an extremely dangerous guard game, but Amosov is an educated grappler, and I'd expect him to stay safe from top position and to counter Alvarez's aggression by passing and getting to more dominant positions, where he can potentially lock in a submission.
If Alvarez can maintain distance and utilize his long limbs to hurt Amosov (particularly with knees and elbows on entry) or sink in a choke as Amosov shoots for a takedown, he can pull the upset. Still, Alvarez tends to end up on the bottom in all of his fights, and I do trust Amosov and his championship-level fight IQ to win minutes if this fight goes the distance, even though the Spaniard should land the more damaging strikes.
I show slight value on Alvarez's moneyline (projected +147, listed +160), but it's difficult to pull the trigger at a minimal edge when I rate both fighters so highly. I also don't see clear value in the odds for the fight to end inside the distance. Still, I do project an edge on either Alvarez to win by KO/TKO (projected +371, listed +750) or on Amosov to win by submission (projected +367, listed +515), which you can combine in a double chance prop (projected +135, listed +190).
You can play the double chance prop, but if you structure the individual winning method props together (Amosov Submission and Alvarez KO/TKO) to generate the same profit regardless of which wins, you can generate substantially better odds and expected ROI.
Meanwhile, continue to monitor the underdog moneyline to see if you can get a better price before fight time.
Bets
- Joel Alvarez wins by KO/TKO (+750, 0.08u), BallyBet; bet to +400
- Yaroslav Amosov wins by Submission (+500, 0.12u), FanDuel; bet to +400
Ateba Gautier vs. Ozzy Diaz
| Middleweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Gautier | -1050 |
| Diaz | +675 |
| Over/Under 1.5 Rounds | +210/-280 |
Projection: Gautier (87.9%)
Saturday's featured prelim sets up as a highlight reel knockout opportunity for Cameroonian-born Ateba Gautier, who is both the biggest favorite on the card and 11 years younger than his opponent, Ozzy Diaz.
Gautier has scored at least one knockdown in each of his five promotional fights, including a pair in a decision win over Andrey Pulyaev in his last outing. Conversely, Diaz was knocked down and put out by both Joe Pyfer and Mingyang Zhang in his first two promotional appearances, before scoring a decision win over Djorden Santos.
Gautier showed an inability to cut off the cage and appropriately pressure a mobile Pulyaev, but Diaz is far more flat-footed and will be there for Gautier to slug in the pocket. If the fight extends, Diaz's only chance is to outpace Gautier and land more volume.
It's difficult to find an actionable betting angle on this fight, as I don't see any playable edges on the moneyline, total, or any winning-method props at current prices, and I can't recommend Gautier by Round 1 KO/TKO with that line juiced to -140 (at best). Still, that line indicates that you should load up on Gautier in DFS lineups.
If you need a bet for this fight, I'd lean towards an SGP with Gautier and Under 0.5 Rounds (+230); five of his eight career wins have ended within 2.5 minutes, and given his prospect status and potential trajectory, Diaz should be, by far, the easiest opponent he will ever face again.
Bets
- SGP: Ateba Gautier and Under 0.5 Rounds (+230, 0.1u), DraftKings; bet to +200
King Green vs. Jeremy Stephens
| Lightweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Green | -425 |
| Stephens | +330 |
| Over/Under x.5 Rounds | -160/+124 |
Projection: Green (71.4%)
For additional information on Saturday's main card opener, check out the full fight preview from my colleague, John Lanfranca.
Jeremy Stephens hasn't won a UFC fight since 2018 (1-8, 1 NC), but it's his bare-knuckle career (3-1, with his only loss up several weight classes against Mike Perry) that gives me confidence that he'll be competitive in a swinging match with fellow 39-year-old King Green.
Green is the better volume puncher (+2.8 to -0.3 strike differential at distance) and the superior grappler (62% to 44% control rate). Still, Stephens is both the more durable man and carries significantly more power. Green has been knocked out five times in 28 UFC bouts, as he fights with his hands low and tries to shoulder roll punches, and he's never been particularly good at defending power shots when he sits in the pocket. Moreover, Stephens has one of the most devastating overhand rights in the lightweight division.
Stephens hasn't shown the ability to maintain a measured fighting style at this level when he can't finish opponents. He's been outwrestled, outpointed, and outpaced repeatedly, and Green has the grappling, volume, and cardio to win the majority of minutes in this fight.
That said, I project value on the underdog, setting his moneyline at +250, compared to listed odds of +330. Moreover, I show an edge on Stephens by KO/TKO (projected +464, listed +600), which is worth a small poke down to +500.
Bets
- Jeremy Stephens (+330, 0.2u), DraftKings; bet to +300
- Jeremy Stephens wins by KO/TKO (+600, 0.05u), DraftKings; bet to +500
Sean Brady vs. Joaquin Buckley
| Welterweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Brady | -185 |
| Buckley | +154 |
| Over/Under 2.5 Rounds | -130/+100 |
Projection: Brady (59%)
For additional information on Saturday's welterweight bout, check out the full fight preview from my colleague, Dan Tom.
I had initially planned to bet Sean Brady in this matchup if his price had moved back towards -150. Still, after some post-weigh-in movement, Buckley is becoming more of the value side of the moneyline, and I'm inclined to pass on this matchup unless Buckley's moneyline gets out closer to +160 prefight.
Buckley was soundly outgrappled in his first main event try against Kamaru Usman (ceded 12:57 control time across a 25-minute fight). Still, he showed a lot of heart and ultimately won the fifth round (and part of the third and fourth rounds, too) after denying 8 of Usman's final 9 takedown attempts. He subsequently joined Usman to train for his matchup with Brady, a dominant but one-dimensional grappler, who – like Pat Sabatini and Grant Dawson – looks both uneasy and chiny when struck at striking range against more powerful opponents.
Buckley is both the bigger man (4" reach advantage) and the far more technical and powerful striker than Brady; it's just difficult to imagine him not getting taken down (72% takedown defense) and controlled (91% vs. 44% control rate) by Brady early.
Still, if Buckley can survive those takedowns – and either scramble back to his feet or show that he can stay safe on bottom, I'd be interested in live betting him after Round 1. He showed a lot of heart in that loss to Usman, and training with the former champion should help to level up his ever-improving takedown defense and bottom game.
Buckley hasn't faced many grapplers of Brady's caliber. Still, he looks like he might improve coming off his first main event loss, while subsequently working with the fighter who defeated him to shore up the specific holes in his game that he needs to excel against this type of opponent matchup.
This is a relatively binary fight, but my projections line up with both the totals and the winning-method props. I'd consider taking Buckley at +160 or better, but suspect you might get a better number in the live market.
If Buckley quickly shows he can work up from takedowns or deny Brady's entries altogether, he's worth a live bet during or after Round 1.
Bets
- Joaquin Buckley Live after Round 1
Alexander Volkov vs. Waldo Cortes-Acosta
| Heavyweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Volkov | -142 |
| Cortes-Acosta | +120 |
| Over/Under 2.5 Rounds | -260/+195 |
Projection: Volkov (61%)
For additional information on Saturday's featured bout, check out the full fight preview from my colleague, Billy Ward.
I like both the favorite and the under in this matchup between 50-fight MMA veteran Alexander Volkov and former baseball player Waldo Cortes-Acosta.
Volkov is the bigger man (3" taller, 3" reach advantage) and the more proven distance striker against superior competition (+2.8 to +1.8 differential per minute at distance). I also view him as the superior grappler, although the stats indicate otherwise, given Waldo's win over Robelis Despaigne (three takedowns, 9:49 control time). If either fighter has grappling success in this matchup, I'd expect it to be Volkov (landed three takedowns for 4:32 control time against Ciryl Gane in a close split loss).
Cortes-Acosta is the faster, more agile athlete, but Volkov will use his jab and teep kicks to control distance and leverage his frame in the clinch to close space and negate Waldo's speed advantage when he desires. He has more ways to win the fight and a higher Fight IQ, with nearly as many UFC fights (18) as Cortes-Acosta has total professional fights (20).
I projected Volkov around -155 in this fight, and would take his moneyline small to -145. Additionally, I set the fight to end within the distance around 47% of the time (+113 implied), and would bet that prop down to +120, compared to a three-round Heavyweight and Light Heavyweight average of 44% and implied odds closer to 40%.
Lastly, I would take Volkov to land one takedown at any plus-money price.
Bets
- Alexander Volkov (-125, 0.25u), DraftKings; bet to -145
- Alexander Volkov, Over 0.5 Takedowns (+110, 0.1u), DraftKings; bet to +100
- Fight Ends Inside the Distance (+165, 0.25u), DraftKings; bet to +120
Josh Van vs. Tatsuro Taira
| Flyweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Van | +130 |
| Taira | -155 |
| Over/Under 3.5 Rounds | -125/-105 |
Projection: Taira (59.4%)
For additional information on Saturday's flyweight title bout, including a full statistical breakdown, make sure to check out the full fight preview from my colleague, Dan Tom.
Saturday's flyweight title bout is the first UFC championship fight between fighters born in the aughts, as 24-year-old Burmese striker Joshua Van faces 26-year-old Japanese grappling specialist Tatsuro Taira.
Taira will look to be the first Japanese fighter to capture UFC gold. He's the bigger man than Van (2" taller, 5" reach advantage) and has a tricky grappling style that complements his long limbs. He's proven to be a dominant control grappler (86% to 44% control rate), and he also puts his opponents in very bad positions, where he can finish the fight via submission or ground-and-pound.
Van has shown a consistently improving takedown defense (81%), but he's a notoriously slow starter; it seems he wants to feel his opponents' strength in a grappling exchange before he begins to turn up the tempo.
Once Van does turn up the volume, however, few can keep pace with him; he has averaged 9.4 distance strikes landed per minute, and is the far more efficient striker than Taira (+1.9 to -1.4 differential), who does carry bigger power of the pair.
If Taira cannot get the grappling going, particularly early, I'd expect Van to run away with the fight eventually. Taira generated 12 minutes of control, on six takedowns against Brandon Royval, but still got tripled up on volume throughout his first main event test (124-42 on significant strikes), and I could see a similar dynamic playing out here.
I projected Taira around -145, essentially in line with the market, and I expect this fight to reach a decision around 40% of the time, which is also at the midpoint of the market for the distance prop.
I would consider betting two potential winning method props for this fight – Van by decision (projected +361, listed +475) or Taira by submission (projected +203, listed +220) – otherwise, I would wait for a live entry on Van, once he has time to adjust and show he can resist Taira's plan of attack.
Bets
- Joshua Van wins by Decision (+450, 0.1u), FanDuel; bet to +375
- Joshua Van Live after Round 1
[Click to return to table of contents]
Khamzat Chimaev vs. Sean Strickland
| Middleweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Chiamev | -575 |
| Strickland | +425 |
| Over/Under 3.5 Rounds | +114/-145 |
Projection: Chimaev (80.6%)
For additional information on Saturday's middleweight title bout, including a full statistical breakdown, make sure to check out my full fight preview.
In short, I think there is generally a Chimaev-early, Strickland-late dynamic to this matchup, which dictates a specific pre-fight betting strategy before a potential live bet on the challenger.
I show a small pre-fight edge on Sean Strickland (projected +415, listed +460 at BetRivers). Still, I'm almost certain that you'll find a better number on the underdog in the live market, with the peak price (if he ultimately rallies) likely coming after or during Round 2.
A Same-Game Parlay (SGP) with Strickland and the Over 2.5 Rounds pays around +525, which I believe is the majority of his win condition. However, that price is not substantially better than his moneyline, and you may get a better number in the live market by that point of the fight, anyway.
Playing an SGP with Chimaev and the Under 1.5 Rounds (+190) and/or Under 2.5 Rounds (+110) is likely better than laying the juice on the favorite. Chimaev only pays off his steep price tag with a quick, dominant finish, or a similarly dominant control-based performance as he had against DDP, and I doubt we see a repeat of the latter.
If Chimaev doesn't finish within the first 10 minutes, you can factor in the pace to that point, along with the current body language of both fighters, to decide whether a live entry on Strickland is appropriate.
Bets
- SGP: Khamzat Chimaev and Under 2.5 Rounds (+110, 0.25u), DraftKings
- Sean Strickland Live after Round 2
Sean Zerillo's UFC 328 Picks & Predictions
For additional notifications about UFC 328 bets, follow me in the Action Network App.
Moneyline Bets
- Jose Ochoa (-170, 0.25u), DraftKings; bet to -185
- Pat Sabatini (-165, 0.5u), DraftKings; bet to -230
- Roman Kopylov (+160, 0.25u), ScoreBet, bet to +135
- Mateusz Rebecki (+140, 0.25u), Caesars; bet to +120
- Jeremy Stephens (+330, 0.2u), DraftKings; bet to +300
- Alexander Volkov (-125, 0.25u), DraftKings; bet to -150
Prop Bets, Totals, and SGPs
- Kopylov/Tulio, Fight Starts Round 3 (-125, 0.25u), DraftKings; bet to -150
- Miller/Gordon, Fight Ends Inside the Distance (+130, 0.35u), FanDuel; bet to +120
- Rebecki/Dawson, Fight Ends Inside the Distance (-104, 0.35u), FanDuel; bet to -120
- Joel Alvarez wins by KO/TKO (+750, 0.08u), BallyBet; bet to +400
- Yaroslav Amosov wins by Submission (+500, 0.12u), FanDuel; bet to +400
- Jeremy Stephens wins by KO/TKO (+600, 0.05u), DraftKings; bet to +500
- Alexander Volkov, Over 0.5 Takedowns (+110, 0.1u), DraftKings; bet to +100
- Cortes-Acosta/Volkov, Fight Ends Inside the Distance (+165, 0.25u), DraftKings; bet to +120
- Joshua Van wins by Decision (+450, 0.1u), FanDuel; bet to +375
Parlays
- SGP: Ateba Gautier and Under 0.5 Rounds (+230, 0.1u), DraftKings; bet to +200
- SGP: Khamzat Chimaev and Under 2.5 Rounds (+110, 0.25u), DraftKings; bet to +100
Live Bets
- Jose Ochoa Live after Round 1
- Joaquin Buckley Live after Round 1
- Jared Gordon Live after Round 1
- Josh Van Live after Round 1
- Sean Strickland Live after Round 2
