Check out my UFC 322 predictions for every fight on tonight's pay-per-view at Madison Square Garden in New York, New York.
Below, I look at the latest UFC 322 odds and break down and predict each bout on today's PPV fight card with updated odds. You can also find my prop and finish projections for each fight.
Let's break it down.
UFC 322 Predictions
After examining all betting options, a typical UFC card can offer substantial actionable value, and after looking at the UFC 322 odds, today's event is no exception.
So, in addition to moneylines and over/unders, I'll break down how I plan to bet on all the fights based on the latest UFC 322 odds, including exact winning methods, winning round props, and whether the match will go to a decision or finish inside the distance.
UFC 322 odds are as of Saturday morning and via DraftKings. Bet on UFC 322 with our DraftKings promo code.
UFC 322 Moneyline Projections
Odds as of Saturday and via DraftKings.
UFC 322 Prop Projections
In addition to creating a crowdsourced projection for moneyline plays, I also collect data on each fighter's likelihood of winning by decision, knockout, or submission, enabling us to determine fair odds for each fight to go the distance and for each fighter to win inside the distance.
| Picks |
|---|
| Matheus Camilo vs. Viacheslav Borshchev |
| Malcolm Wellmaker vs. Ethyn Ewing |
| Baisangur Susurkaev vs. Eric McConico |
| Fatima Kline vs. Angela Hill |
| Pat Sabatini vs. Chepe Mariscal |
| Kyle Daukaus vs. Gerald Meerschaert |
| Erin Blanchfield vs. Tracy Cortez |
| Gregory Rodrigues vs. Roman Kopylov |
| Bo Nickal vs. Rodolfo Viera |
| Benoit Saint-Denis vs. Beneil Dariush |
| Carlos Prates vs. Leon Edwards |
| Sean Brady vs. Michael Morales |
| Valentina Shevchenko vs. Zhang Weili |
| Islam Makhachev vs. Jack Della Maddalena |
Fight times are approximate and subject to change. All times ET.
Matheus Camilo vs. Viacheslav Borshchev
| Lightweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Matheus Camilo | -175 |
| Viacheslav Borshchev | +145 |
| Over/Under 2.5 Rounds | +135/-175 |
Projection: Matheus Camilo (60.1%)
For additional analysis of this matchup – including a full statistical breakdown – check out the full fight preview from my colleague, Billy Ward.
I don't project an edge on either side of the moneyline for this lightweight fight. However, I projected the bout to go to decision around 48% of the time (+110 implied odds), compared to a divisional average of around 46% in three-round lightweight bouts, and odds as high as +178 (36% implied) in the betting market.
Moreover, I project an edge on Camilo – who is nine years younger than Borschev – to win by decision (projected +262, listed +390). The Brazilian should have a significant grappling edge in this fight, and will be hunting a finish on the mat against an opponent with a known wrestling and grappling deficiency (12% control rate in grappling exchanges)
As alternatives to betting Camilo to win by decision, I would consider his point spread (-3.5, -115) or a same-game parlay (SGP) with Camilo and the Over 1.5 Rounds (+170) or Over 2.5 Rounds (+285).
Bets
- Matheus Camilo -3.5 Points (-110, 0.1u) at DraftKings; bet to -125
- Matheus Camilo wins by Decision (+390, 0.1u) at FanDuel
Malcolm Wellmaker vs. Ethyn Ewing
| Bantamweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Malcolm Wellmaker | -455 |
| Ethyn Ewing | +350 |
| Over/Under 1.5 Rounds | +135/-175 |
Projection: Malcolm Wellmaker (75.6%)
Ethyn Ewing is Malcolm Wellmaker's third opponent for Saturday, after Serhiy Sidey and Cody Haddon withdrew from scheduled bookings.
Since Wellmaker-Ewing is a late addition to the card, I waited as long as possible to finalize my prop projections for this fight – and I only show a slight edge on Ewing by KO/TKO (projected +584, listed +650) based upon initial odds.
I'll come back to this fight after more money sharpens the prop market, but there's nothing I'm particularly interested in betting as of writing.
Bets
Baisangur Susurkaev vs. Eric McConico
| Middleweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Baisangur Susurkaev | -1050 |
| Eric McConico | +675 |
| Over/Under 1.5 Rounds | +175/-230 |
Projection: Baisangur Susurkaev (91.4%)
Baisangur Susurkaev enters UFC 322 as the heaviest moneyline favorite on Saturday's card, after closing as a -1200 favorite in his UFC debut in August against Eric Nolan – just four days after his contract-winning performance on Contender Series.
Surukaev is the bigger man than McConico (2" taller, 2" reach advantage), and more than a decade younger than his opponent, too. He's also the more explosive and durable athlete, with a more well-rounded skillset.
McConico can navigate his way to a comeback when his opponents tend to fade. Still, Susurkaev, who seemed a bit diminished against Nolan, after cutting weight twice within the same week, is unlikely to leave a do.or open for him to rally late in the fight.
I do show a slight edge on Susurkaev's moneyline (projected -1058, listed -835 at BetRivers) or his odds to win by decision (projected +544, listed +600 at BetMGM), depending on the book. I would consider using his moneyline up to -1000 in a parlay; otherwise, I would likely pass on betting on this matchup.
Bets
Fatima Kline vs. Angela Hill
| Strawweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Fatima Kline | -520 |
| Angela Hill | +390 |
| Over/Under 2.5 Rounds | -360/+260 |
Projection: Fatima Kline (87.9%)
For additional analysis of this matchup – including a full statistical breakdown – check out the full fight preview from my colleague, John LanFranca.
There is a 15-year age gap in this fight between the 40-year-old Hill and the 25-year-old Kline. There are only 69 MMA fights (with odds) in the past ten years that have featured at least a 15-year age gap between opponents; the younger fighter is 41-18 (59.4%) in those matchups, at average odds of -120 (54.6% implied) – surpassing expectations by nearly 5%.
I do project an edge on Kline's moneyline (projected -723, listed -500) and would include her as a parlay piece to -700, or look to bet her odds to win by submission (projected +532, listed +650) or inside the distance (projected +322).
Bets
- Fatima Kline wins by Submission (+650, 0.1u) at FanDuel; bet to +550
- Parlay (+138, 0.25u) at FanDuel: Fatima Kline (-500), Erin Blanchfield (-240), Meerschaert/Daukaus Fight Ends Inside the Distance (-240)
Pat Sabatini vs. Chepe Mariscal
| Featherweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Pat Sabatini | -118 |
| Chepe Mariscal | -102 |
| Over/Under 2.5 Rounds | -154/+120 |
Projection: Pat Sabatini (59%)
Pat Sabatini and Chepe Mariscal faced one another in a regional bout in 2018, with Sabatini prevailing by split decision at Victory FC 60 in Hammond, Indiana.
Both fighters have come a long way since then, ahead of their rematch at UFC 322. Still, the dynamic remains the same: Sabatini is the superior grappler, and Mariscal the far more technical striker, making this a relatively binary matchup.
Sabatini is a very effective wrestler (attempts 14.3 takedowns per 5 minutes, 49% accuracy), considering most jiu-jitsu practitioners struggle to land takedowns and get their fights to the mat. He's also a dominant control grappler (87% control rate vs. 70% for Chepe), particularly when he can find a back take and consolidate position.
Still, Sabatini doesn't have a great chin, and Chepe – who can grapple a bit himself – is the far better striker – outlanding opponents by 0.8 significant strikes per minute. In contrast, Sabatini has lagged behind his opposition by the same margin.
Still, Chepe is the most popular and public underdog selection of the week – bettors and fans are picking him to win the fight 63% of the time, on average, compared to implied odds nearer to 47%. Considering my model is designed to track book needs, I projected Sabatini as a -144 favorite and would play his moneyline up to -138, at a 1% edge compared to my number.
I don't project an edge on the total. Still, I do show a slight edge on Sabatini to win by submission (projected +465, listed +700) or inside the distance (projected +358, listed +460); if he's going to get to the positions he needs to to win a comfortable decision on control time, Sabatini should have several opportunities to lock in a fight-ending submission; still, he doesn' tend to take unncessary risks from dominant positions, which can be frustrating to watch.
Bets
- Pat Sabatini (-115, 0.5u) at Fanatics; bet to -138
Kyle Daukaus vs. Gerald Meerschaert
| Middleweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Kyle Daukaus | -470 |
| Gerald Meerschaert | +360 |
| Over/Under 1.5 Rounds | -154/+120 |
Projection: Kyle Daukaus (75.6%)
Gerald Meerschaert III (GM3) is the promotional record-holder for middleweight finishes and submissions (12). Still, he's 0-5 on the scorecards in the UFC, and facing an opponent in Kyle Daukaus who can both grapple (61% vs. 49% control rate) and has never been submitted.
Daukaus is the better striker than GM3 (+2.1 to +0.1 strike differential per minute). Although he is a bit chinny, those concerns are alleviated in a matchup against a submission artist whose best strike is a body kick.
Neither man is a particularly potent offensive wrestler (30% takedown rate for GM3, 24% for Daukaus). Still, Daukaus is the younger, quicker athlete with much better takedown defense (77% vs. 43%) and elusiveness, and I'd expect him to be able to dictate where the fight plays out.
And while Daukaus remains near his prime at 32-years-old – on a four-fight winning streak and in his second UFC stint – GM3 is nearing retirement, having lost three consecutive bouts, and five of his past seven, while losing by finish in four of those contests; GM3 seemingly doesn't have the physicality, durability, or cardio to complete in the UFC in his late thirties.
I show an edge on the under, or the fight to end inside the distance (projected -319, listed -235) and would play that prop to around -300. Alternatively, or in addition, bet Daukaus to win inside the distance (projected -172, listed -125) up to -165.
Bets
- Kyle Daukaus wins Inside the Distance (-125, 0.25u) at FanDuel; bet to -165
Erin Blanchfield vs. Tracy Cortez
| Flyweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Erin Blanchfield | -270 |
| Tracy Cortez | +220 |
| Over/Under 2.5 Rounds | -500 /+340 |
Projection: Erin Blanchfield (74.2%)
For additional analysis of this matchup – including a full statistical breakdown – check out the full fight preview from my colleague, Billy Ward.
This bout is a rematch of Blanchfield's fourth career fight at Invicta FC 34 in 2019, which Tracy Cortez won by split decision. Still, while Blanchfield was 19 years old at the time – and Cortez was in her physical prime in her mid-twenties, Blanchfield should have the athletic advantage in the rematch; now in her own physical prime, whereas Cortez is on the wrong side of the divisional age curve (average age of 31).
Both fighters possess similar skill sets and have had remarkably similar careers by the numbers; both have been slightly edged out by opponents at distance (-0.1 and -0.2 strike differential per minute), and both average around three takedown attempts per five-minute range. Still, Blanchfield has proven the more effective control grappler (96% vs. 71% control rate) and her striking is clearly the most improved aspect of either fighter's skillset, relative ot the initial booking.
I show an edge on the fight to go to decision (projected -426, listed -360) and for Blanchfield to win by decision (projected -150, listed -125); use the former as a parlay piece to -400, or take the latter straight to -140.
Bets
- Erin Blanchfield wins by Decision (-125, 0.25u) at FanDuel; bet to -140
Gregory Rodrigues vs. Roman Kopylov
| Middleweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Gregory Rodrigues | -185 |
| Roman Kopylov | +154 |
| Over/Under 1.5 Rounds | -154/+120 |
Projection: Gregory Rodrigues (54.8%)
Gregory "Robocop" Rodrigues is the taller man and the far superior grappler (77% vs. 44% control rate) to Roman Kopylov; still, both Rodrigues and Kopylov tend to fade by the third round when they either proactively or defensively grapple in their respective bouts.
Rodrigues carries more power and has the better strike differential (+0.5 to -0.1 per minute) than Kopylov at distance. Still, he attempts fewer than three takedowns per five minutes, and if he is unable to consolidate a back take, he often lets his opponents scramble back to their feet far too effortlessly.
Kopylov is the superior technician – with sharp boxing and a more refined kicking game, and he tends to work the body, which could prove crucial against such a muscled-up opponent. Still, I don't love his own stamina when he is pressured backwards. Unless he's able to take advantage and wobble or knock down a potentially chinny Rodrigues, he could be in a defensive posture from the opening bell.
If Kopylov can deny the takedowns (88% career) and match Robocop's gas tank, however, his technique will eventually take over the minute-winning of the fight.
Bets
- Roman Kopylov (+165, 0.35u) at Caesars; bet to +130
Bo Nickal vs. Rodolfo Viera
| Middleweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Bo Nickal | -205 |
| Rodolfo Viera | +170 |
| Over/Under 2.5 Rounds | -166/+130 |
Projection: Bo Nickal (61.5%)
For additional analysis of this matchup – including a full statistical breakdown – check out the full fight preview from my colleague, John LanFranca.
Bo Nickal returns to the Octagon in Saturday's featured prelim, after losing to Reinier de Ridder as a -440 favorite in May.
Rodolfo Viera presents a similar stylistic matchup for Nickal as Paul Craig, whom Nickal beat in a low-output, unexciting, but relatively close striking affair last November.
Despite a lower strike differential (-0.6 to +0.4 per minute), I rate Vieira as the better striker in this matchup, and the 17-time jiu-jitsu world champion is a better overall wrestler and grappler than Craig, too.
Nickal may be able to land takedowns and hold top position, but I doubt that he wants to proactively grapple with "The Black Belt Hunter" for extended stretches; Vieira is merely one transition (to half guard or the back) away from finishing Nickal (via arm triangle or rear-naked choke) if the fight happens to hit the mat. He has a higher control rate (89% vs. 85%) than Nickal in his UFC tenure.
As a result, Nickal's best path may be to focus on his striking, as he did against Craig; I am just severely doubtful that we will see significant improvements in his striking technique to raise his potential ceiling to that of a future world champion.
I make Vieira's moneyline around +160, and would bet him to +175. Additionally, I project a slight edge on the fight to reach a decision (projected -137) and a correlated edge on Vieira to win by decision (projected +441, listed +500); still, I prefer the underdog moneyline to either prop wager.
Bets
- Rodolfo Vieira (+195, 0.5u) at Caesars; bet to +170
Benoit Saint-Denis vs. Beneil Dariush
| Lightweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Benoit Saint-Denis | -180 |
| Beneil Dariush | +150 |
| Over/Under 1.5 Rounds | -140/+110 |
Projection: Benoit Saint-Denis (65.2%)
For additional analysis of this matchup – including a full statistical breakdown – check out the full fight preview from my colleague, Billy Ward.
Beneil Dariush missed weight on Friday, coming in 1.2 pounds over the lightweight limit of 156 lbs. – raising additional concerns around the durability of the 36-year-old, who lost by knockout twice in 2023, before returning to defeat Renato Moicano in June.
Benoit Saint-Denis (BSD) is the younger man and the far more imposing physical specimen in the matchup. He will use his pressure and aggression to wear on Dariush, a superior technician in all aspects of MMA, whose body is in apparent physical decline, in his late thirties, with 3x the amount of UFC cage time as his opponent, which, in this case, is more of a negative than a positive.
I don't expect BSD to land takedowns – or hold position on the ground for long stretches; Dariush is rarely outwrestled by opponents (82% vs. 79% control rate); still, I do expect the Frenchman to smother Dariush up against the fence for several minutes at a time, and to land attritional damage that could eventually slow Dariush down, and lead to a finish.
BSD excels at smothering and drowning opponents with pace, and even though I might favor Dariush in a pure grappling match, with no walls or striking, he makes the most of his physicality edge with his cage grappling.
If you're betting against BSD, you'll almost certainly find a better live price after the first round; he's a dominant early-minute winner.
A finely tuned Dariush is the better striker (+1.1 to 0 differential per minute at distance), and he should theoretically have the wrestling defense (82%) to keep the fight at range in a big cage. Still, I think the age differential, weight miss, and physicality gap between the fighters will prove the difference in this bout.
I don't project value on either side of the moneyline at current odds, but would take Saint-Denis at -180 or better.
I do, however, project a slight edge on the Overs, or the fight to go to decision (projected +179, listed +200), and would consider a Same-Game Parlay (SGP) with Saint-Denis and the Over 1.5 Rounds (+180) to capture his decision and late finish equity, against an older fighter who missed weight.
I'm also intrigued by the idea of BSD winning in Round 2 (+470) or Round 3 (+900).
Bets
- SGP: Benoit Saint-Denis & Over 1.5 Rounds (+180, 0.25u) at ESPNBet; bet to +150
Carlos Prates vs. Leon Edwards
| Welterweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Carlos Prates | -162 |
| Leon Edwards | +136 |
| Over/Under 2.5 Rounds | -140/+110 |
Projection: Carlos Prates (54.4%)
For additional analysis of this matchup – including a full statistical breakdown – check out the full fight preview from my colleague, John LanFranca.
I project an edge on the former champion, Leon Edwards, in this matchup, setting his moneyline at +119, compared to listed odds as high as +152.
Prates is the bigger man (4" reach advantage), and the more reliable pressure fighter, but Edwards excels in the clinch and should have whole grappling upside in this matchup against a dangerous Muay Thai specialist.
Edwards has averaged two takedown attempts per 5 minutes at range throughout his career, completing 36% of those attempts, and Prates showed a susceptibility to takedowns and control time as he tired in his last fight against Ian Garry.
If Edwards can win a round as the better grappler – whether by finding a takedown or pushing Prates up against the fence to neutralize the reach differential – then he should be the pre-fight favorite, as the striking exchanges should be highly competitive; Edwards is an excellent counter-striker, and Prates loves to push forward making himself extremely hittable (+0.4 -1.6 striking differential; 53% vs. 48% striking defense).
I also show an edge on Edwards to win by decision (projected +222, listed +290), a prop which I would structure alongside his moneyline.
Bets
- Leon Edwards (+152, 0.35u) at FanDuel; bet to +125
- Leon Edwards wins by Decision (+290, 0.15u) at FanDuel; bet to +235
Sean Brady vs. Michael Morales
| Welterweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Sean Brady | -135 |
| Michael Morales | +114 |
| Over/Under 2.5 Rounds | -160/+124 |
Projection: Michael Morales (52.6%)
For additional analysis of this matchup – including a full statistical breakdown – check out the full fight preview from my colleague, Billy Ward.
I project an edge on Michael Morales in this matchup, setting him as the favorite (projected -111) compared to odds as high as +120 as of writing. I also show an edge on his odds to win by KO/TKO (projected +212, listed +370) and on the fight to end inside the distance (projected -146, listed +104) in this binary matchup.
I believe the unbeaten Ecuadorian is a future world champion, with an incredibly long, athletic frame and a refined, well-rounded skill set.
Morales is the far better striker than Sean Brady, a powerful wrestler and grappler from Philadelphia. He's two inches taller, with a seven-inch reach advantage, and is also seven years younger and much quicker than Brady.
Brady (4.4 takedown attempts per five minutes at distance, 54% accuracy, 91% control rate) is meant to test Morales's defensive grappling (88% takedown defense, 29% control rate), and prove whether the 26-year-old is ready for a title shot, and potential superstardom.
I like both Morales and the ends inside the distance props at plus money, given the potential binary nature of this contest. While he has been taken down and held down for minutes at a time in prior fights – against lesser wrestlers – he's shown an ability to scramble back to his feet consistently, and his striking and durability advantages are as significant as ever in this head-to-head matchup.
Bets
- Michel Morales (+120, 0.5u) at FanDuel; bet to -105
- Fight Ends Inside the Distance (+115, 0.35u) at ESPNBet; bet to -130
Valentina Shevchenko vs. Zhang Weili
| Flyweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Valentina Shevchenko | -135 |
| Zhang Weili | +114 |
| Over/Under 4.5 Rounds | -260 /+195 |
Projection: Valentina Shevchenko (57.9%)
Even though Zhang Weili is moving up from 115 to 125 for this women's superfight, I don't expect Valentina Shevchenko, who previously went up to 135 to fight Amanda Nunes, to have a significant power or physicality advantage as she seeks her ninth career flyweight title defense.
Shevchenko does have a three-inch reach advantage, but Weili should be the quicker fighter and the more voluminous striker, averaging 5.4 strikes landed per minute – compared to 4.1 for Shevchenko – despite the same career-margin (+1.4) per minute.
However, despite a lesser career control rate (74% vs. 67% in favor of Zhang) I do think Shevchenko has the wrestling and grappling edge in this matchup, completing 60% of her career takedown attempts, compared to 46% for Zhang, who lost a title bout on bottom in the same arena at UFC 268, after Rose Namajunas landed and held a fifth round takedown.
Both women are elite in all areas of MMA. Still, either have had mental lapses during the championship runs – particularly when forced to grapple defensively, and I expect Shevchenko to get the better of those minutes on Saturday.
If Zhang were younger, I would consider picking her in this fight – I do think that Shevchenko has started to decline, while Zhang has continued to improve in her recent bouts, if anything.
And I do expect a relatively close and competitive fight between these champions, which goes the full 25 minutes, and potentially ends in another split decision for Zhang at MSG.
I projected this fight to reach a decision about 77% of the time (-333 implied odds), and I would bet the distance or decision prop to -300.
I do show a slight edge on Shevchenko's moneyline (projected -138, listed -135), but might prefer to bet her to win by decision (projected +119, listed +150) down to +125.
Bets
- Valentina Shevchenko wins by Decision (+150, 0.25u) at BallyBet; bet to +125
Islam Makhachev vs. Jack Della Maddalena
| Welterweight Bout | Odds |
|---|
| Islam Makhachev | -305 |
| Jack Della Maddalena | +245 |
| Over/Under 3.5 Rounds | -125/-105 |
Projection: Islam Makhachev (65.9%)
For additional analysis of Saturday's main event and welterweight title bout – including a full statistical breakdown – check out the full fight preview from my colleague, Billy Ward.
I project an edge both on Jack Della Maddelana – setting his moneyline at +193 compared to odds as high as +250 as of writing – and the under or the fight to end inside the distance, setting that prop at -185, compared to listed odds of -155.
He's the bigger man (1" taller, 3" reach advantage), the better striker +2.1 to +0.9 differential per minute at distance), and both the younger and more durable athlete than Islam Makhachev, who should have a clear technical wrestling advantage (attempts 4.6 takedowns per five minutes, 54% accuracy) over Jack Della (69% takedown defense, 16% control rate).
Jack should deal more damage at range and have a better gas tank throughout the fight. While Makhachev isn't cutting as much weight to make 170, carrying more on his body and wrestling heavier opponents is a bigger drain on his system than his opponents'. I'd expect Jack to have more success defending takedowns the longer the fight goes; still, Makhachev could finish the fight on the mat quickly if Jack allows him to get to the same positions Bassil Hafez or Gilbert did in previous matchups.
I view this as a relatively binary title fight, where either man can find the finish. I do think Makhachev's striking has gotten significantly better since entering the UFC. Still, there's a distinct possibility he struggles with the power and physicality differential in the 15-pound jump from lightweight to welterweight.
Bets
- Jack Della Maddalena (+250, 0.25u) at Caesars; bet to +200
- Fight Ends Inside the Distance (-155, 0.25u) at BetRivers; bet to -175
Sean Zerillo's UFC 322 Picks & Predictions
For additional notifications about UFC 322 bets, follow me in the Action Network App.
Moneyline Bets
- Pat Sabatini (-115, 0.5u) at Fanatics; bet to -133
- Roman Kopylov (+165, 0.35u) at Caesars; bet to +130
- Rodolfo Vieira (+195, 0.5u) at Caesars; bet to +170
- Leon Edwards (+152, 0.35u) at FanDuel; bet to +125
- Michel Morales (+120, 0.5u) at FanDuel; bet to -105
- Jack Della Maddalena (+250, 0.25u) at Caesars; bet to +200
Prop Bets and Totals
- Matheus Camilo -3.5 Points (-110, 0.1u) at DraftKings; bet to -125
- Matheus Camilo wins by Decision (+390, 0.1u) at FanDuel
- Fatima Kline wins by Submission (+650, 0.1u) at FanDuel; bet to +550
- Kyle Daukaus wins Inside the Distance (-125, 0.25u) at FanDuel; bet to -165
- Erin Blanchfield wins by Decision (-125, 0.25u) at FanDuel; bet to -140
- Leon Edwards wins by Decision (+290, 0.15u) at FanDuel; bet to +235
- Morales/Brady, Fight Ends Inside the Distance (+115, 0.35u) at ESPNBet; bet to -130
- Valentina Shevchenko wins by Decision (+150, 0.25u) at BallyBet; bet to +125
- Makhachev/Della Maddalena, Fight Ends Inside the Distance (-155, 0.25u) at BetRivers; bet to -175
Parlays
- SGP: Benoit Saint-Denis & Over 1.5 Rounds (+180, 0.25u) at ESPNBet; bet to +150
- Parlay (+138, 0.25u) at FanDuel: Fatima Kline (-500), Erin Blanchfield (-240), Meerschaert/Daukaus Fight Ends Inside the Distance (-240)
Live Bets
